Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”
After Muslim grooming gangs carried out systemic sexual assaults and trafficked thousands of British girls, the Starmer government and its Pakistani Muslim Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood have announced that the real crisis is ‘sexism’ as practiced by English schoolboys.
The new ‘War on Boys’ program announced by Starmer and Mahmood will train teachers to “spot early signs of misogyny in boys”. Boys who are flagged for misogyny will be directed to special classes on the dangers of ‘toxic masculinity’ and the crime of being born male.
“Every parent should be able to trust that their daughter is safe at school, online and in her relationships,” Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whom many blame for the cover-up of Muslim sex grooming gangs that targeted thousands of vulnerable underage girls, claimed. “This government is stepping in sooner – backing teachers, calling out misogyny, and intervening when warning signs appear to stop harm before it starts.”
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch blasted the ‘War on Boys’ stating that, “It’s not 11-year-old boys in school who are perpetrating violence against women and girls” and urging the Starmer regime to “stop people who come from cultures that don’t respect women coming into our country.”
Media coverage of the new anti-misogyny classes has referenced Andrew Tate, a black Muslim social media influencer, who, along with his brother, has been entangled in accusations of rape and sex trafficking. Tate has been championed by woke right figures like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, but the media has been much more reluctant to discuss his Islamic religion, and his decision to carry a Koran when arriving in court in Romania over alleged human trafficking.
Surveys show that Tate is far more popular among Muslims in the UK than among the native population. 72% of young Muslim men, the population most likely to commit sexual offenses, like Tate, while only a minority of British people do. Despite that the media is using young white boys as the face of their ‘anti-misogyny’ campaign rather the actual Tate Muslim fanbase.
Foreign nationals, often migrants, accounted for 1 in 7 sex assault convictions in 2024. An increase of 62% in four years. Foreign nationals make up over 1 in 10 sex offenders in prison with a rate of increase three times that of the native population. Pakistanis make up one of the four countries dominating the list of foreign sex offenders in prison.
Rather than deal with the real problem, the Starmer government and Home Secretary Mahmood have decided, in the words of the BBC headline, “Schoolboys to be target of UK’s violence against women strategy.” This comes even as the country is reeling after a video showed two Afghan Muslim migrant refugees dragging away a 15-year-old girl into the bushes while she pleads for help and then raping her. The two Afghan invaders claimed to be 17-year-olds.
But these are not the ‘schoolboys’ that Starmer and Mahmood are going to war against.
British authorities did their best to cover up the horrifying Muslim assault, falsely implying that the two Afghans were local boys and trying to suppress their names and identities.
“There are cultural differences,” the lawyer for one of the Muslim rapists argued. “He is not used to a society where women are free and deemed equal to men.”
This was the second time that an Afghan had raped a 15-year-old girl in the UK while blaming cultural differences in just 2025, but it’s not the Afghans being subjected to ‘misogny’ classes.
Mahmood and the Starmer government claims that treating Muslim migrants as a threat to women is ‘Islamophobia’ while treating all English schoolboys as a threat is a good policy.
The violence against women and girls (VAWG) strategy and the media coverage of it has carefully avoided any discussion of Islam, even though that is the only religion that tells its followers that it is permissible to beat women and to rape non-Muslim women and girls.
It’s hard to think of a more ‘toxic’ masculinity that the one embodied by Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, and his teachings, which include telling husbands “those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them” and commanding “the women of the believers to draw their cloaks all over their bodies that they may thus be distinguished and not molested” which led to the burka, the hijab and other ‘coverings’.
“When it comes to rape, it’s 90 percent the woman’s responsibility,” Sheikh Hilaly, Australia’s top Muslim cleric, had argued. The Islamic scholar “Al-Rafi’i says, if I came across a rape crime, I would discipline the man and order that the woman be jailed for life. Why would you do this, al-Rafi’i? He said because if she had not left the meat uncovered, the cat wouldn’t have snatched it.” Any women and girls not wearing hijabs can be freely raped by Muslim men.
These are the attitudes that led to the Muslim sex grooming gangs and destroyed the lives of countless victims, and many critics call Starmer’s ‘War on Boys’ yet another cover-up of it.
Instead of tackling this actual ‘rape culture’, PM Starmer and Mahmood have decided to go after English schoolboys as the greatest threat to women. What’s their basis for it? According to CBS News and other media outlets, it’s based on a fictional Netflix series ‘Adolescence’. The testimonies of multiple Muslim grooming gang victims couldn’t move Starmer to action, but then he watched a made-up show on Netflix and decided to go on a Jihad after English schoolboys.
“Watching this show with my teenage son and daughter, I can tell you it hit home hard,” PM Starmer claimed. Starmer had led the Crown Prosecution Service which covered up Muslim sex grooming gangs and blamed “credibility issues” with the abused girls for not prosecuting their rapists. The prime minister believes a Netflix show has more credibility than actual victims at least if it produces the policy he already wants to pursue, letting Muslim rapists off the hook, while indicting young British boys as monsters and misogynists on account of their DNA.
British families need to decide if they want a government that will protect their daughters or persecute their sons while protecting the gangs of rapists swarming their beaches and shores.
