Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”
ntil recently, Rahmeh Aladwan worked as a doctor, training in trauma and orthopedics for the National Health Service. Her hobby, when she’s not treating patients, is to engage in nonstop antisemitic rants on social media. She’s proud of what she spews, for hours at a time, on X/Twitter. She has denied there were any rapes by Hamas on October 7, uses the Nazi imagery of Jews as vermin, mocks the Holocaust, expresses support for terrorism and terrorists — in short, she’s been having a high old time trying to torment Jews emotionally, and if she could, would undoubtedly do so physically. Now she’s been suspended from practice for 15 months. More on Rahmeh Aladwan can be found here: “Antisemitic UK doctor Rahmeh Aladwan suspended for 15 months, blames ‘Jewish lobby,’” by Mathilda Heller, Jerusalem Post, November 30, 2025:
Antisemitic UK doctor Rahmeh Aladwan has been suspended for 15 months after a tribunal found her conduct to fall “well below the professional standards of a registered doctor.”
Aladwan – a trainee in trauma and orthopedics – was referred to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) by the General Medical Council (GMC) on October 7, 2025, in order to determine her fitness to practice.
The legal counsel for the GMC, Emma Gilsenan, submitted to the hearing a risk assessment of the doctor’s social media posts on X/Twitter, in which she “justifies terrorism, denies sexual violence, includes antisemitic conspiracy theories, misuses Holocaust and Nazi imagery, and expresses support for proscribed groups and terrorists [including October 7].”
Gilsenan also outlined a number of social media posts that Aladwan published since 25 September (the date of her interim tribunal), including in relation to the attack on a Manchester synagogue on October 2, which she said showed an escalation in the tone and level of Aladwan’s communications.
Gilsenan said that, considering all the information and applying the correct and straightforward legal test, “it is unconscionable to consider that Aladwan should be permitted to continue to practice,” adding that there is no human right under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) that permits someone to publish antisemitic statements.
Her defense counsel claims her rants do not affect how she fulfills her duties as a doctor. Is this true? Does such a mental morass inspire confidence in her powers of ratiocination? Would you trust such a doctor, with such an obsession, to treat you? And for Jewish patients, it would be still more unsettling and worrisome for them to entrust their care to Radmeh Aladwan. At what point does this obsessive antisemitism rise to the level of sheer nuttiness, that it would be folly to allow her to still practice medicine?
Given her level of mania, I have just one question for the members of the Medical Practitioner’s Tribunal Service: Why did you give her only a fifteen-month suspension from practice? Will she in that time see the error of her ways? Of course not; ever since she started to be investigated, she’s been posting even more hysterically. She ought to have been struck off, period. She’ll find a post without much trouble in Doha or Damascus, where she’ll be treated as a martyr persecuted by those all-powerful Jews. And the U.K. will be rid of one more Muslim it ought never to have admitted in the first place.
