Over the weekend, CNN published a hysterical feature wailing over feminism’s fading appeal to younger women. It comes a few months after a similar New York Times feature. Of course, the legacy publications ingeniously blame “hatred” and misogyny for younger women seeking life patterns outside feminism. You see, it’s not patronizing or psychotic to tell women we can’t make choices that Cluster B covens don’t approve of.
CNN’s opening replicates that of a Rolling Stone article from 2023, sock-puppeting feminist crankiness through a Zoomer who petulantly complains that alluring culture content tricked her into reading non-leftist ideas. CNN quotes 24-year-old “Gabrielle” (no last name provided), who “felt she was being lured in with perky pop culture content, only then to be exposed to right-wing propaganda.”
Oh no! Not accidentally encountering conservative ideas online! Internet censorship is supposed to protect us from such horrors. It’s a shocking bait and switch, see: find yourself agreeing with a critique of some pop star’s antics, then shut down your intuition and self-development after discovering you were agreeing with a yucky conservative!
“I found what they posted to be hateful and trying to trick people into reading their views,” Gabrielle allegedly complained to CNN about Evie magazine. Evie is a non-leftist young woman’s publication that focuses on culture and feminine topics when it is not urging girls to publicly waggle their bare breasts — because even the most “conservative” sensibilities today are still molded by porn.
The reality is, just like Donald Trump, Evie wouldn’t be considered “conservative” by our foremothers, and neither would other women’s “influencers” CNN targets, including Turning Point podcaster Alex Clark and former Daily Wire, now Fox News personality Brett Cooper. These women are exploring femininity under masculine stage names, eyebrows, and even lifestyles. Yet even their standard feminist career-first life arcs don’t excuse them from criticism by CNN, NYT, and Rolling Stone, because they don’t label themselves feminists while mostly living the type of lifestyle that feminists champion.
For example, Clark is 32, unmarried, and without children (although she may be closing in on a ring and talks often about her desire for kids). She’s spent her adult life focusing on her successful career, and could have a second career in Jim Carrey-esque facial expressions and body carriage. That’s not “tradwife.”
Evie founder Brittany Hugoboom founded an investor-backed fertility app and media company before having children and is a “martial arts champion,” an obviously masculine hobby. She also appeared on the reality show “Big Brother,” a half-clothed dramafest Ma Ingalls and Elizabeth Cady Stanton would never watch, let alone audition for.
Just like their audience and our entire culture, these “conservative” “influencers” often don’t quite know what’s archetypally feminine, nor do they constantly embody it, but at least they think it’s a good thing. They are open to femininity, and thus to life. That openness is why CNN and The New York Times hate them.
A Successful Family Is the Highest Achievement in Life
It is, after all, the feminine distinctive to nurture life. Women are the life-givers. Men are the life-guardians. Together, we preserve humanity. Conversely, when separated and pushed into war via feminism, the sexes kill humanity.
Rejecting what the sexes naturally do together — raise children — is the core of feminism. As with leftism, feminism is a death cult. It turns women away from our unique and necessary life-giving capacities. It has morphed the standard American life into a pattern predicated on sterility and murder.
To follow the feminist life script, women must live like a lonely, neutered man. We have to pursue 16 to 18 years of “education” and then another two decades of getting careers on track (and paying off that “education”) before we even start to think of a family. During that time, we have to kill any life we create while fulfilling our natural urges to procreate, or we lose our idolized careers.
As anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows, this sex-swapping life script ages women out of the years it is easiest to have children, and the years they have the upper hand in negotiating a man into a permanent marriage. By urging on relational hostility instead of comity, feminism is directly responsible for much of the decline in female and societal happiness.
CNN calls Evie the leftist slur “alt-right” for aligning with “a worldview that is increasingly gaining support on the right: That women should return to traditional gender roles.” That only sounds scary to people who have been propagandized into the woman-hating view that women acting like women are evil. And it borders on insane to use a dog-whistle for “Nazi” to describe the reality that men and women are different, and those differences matter.
Feminism Hates Women’s Bodies
“In this conservative women’s media sphere,” CNN lectures ominously, “modern feminism is seen as anti-men, casual sex and nontraditional relationship structures are viewed as detrimental, and being a wife and a mother is considered a woman’s highest purpose. These outlets and influencers implore their readers to embrace a long-lost femininity and reclaim control over their bodies through their nutritional and medical choices.”
Wait, I thought it was feminist to support “reclaiming control over our bodies?” Turns out what’s truly feminist is repressing women’s bodies via chemical and surgical castration.
“Evie Magazine has published numerous negative articles about the pill, IUDs and even condoms, instead promoting ‘natural’ birth control methods that can be less effective at preventing pregnancy,” CNN warns, labeling concerns about killing natural body functions for the entirety of one’s childbearing years “misinformation.” It asked Cooper and Clark to respond to “medical experts’ assertions that such statements [about negative effects of birth control] are untrue.”
CNN might want to check The New York Times archives, because their bestseller list includes books by pro-abortion, Yale-trained doctors agreeing that hormonal contraception damages women’s bodies. Its pages include interviews with leftist health practitioners who say hormonal contraception can worsen terrible female maladies, such as PCOS, by masking the underlying causes.
CNN must have missed the feminist endocrinologists with prominent books and fully booked practices treating “the dangerous side effects of the birth control pill.” These feminist medical professionals with entire careers built on treating birth control damage would be enraged to learn that CNN and The New York Times ignore scientific evidence to protect leftist ideology. That’s because their ideology hasn’t stopped them from seeing that birth control absolutely can harm women.
Elsewhere in its section on right-leaning influencers spreading health “misinformation,” CNN spreads even more misinformation (surprise!). “Republican lawmakers around the US have falsely conflated emergency contraceptives and IUDs with abortion,” it states.
“Emergency contraceptives” are abortifacients. That is a scientific fact. It is also a scientific fact that IUDs can starve a tiny embryo to death after conception. Given another scientific fact — that conception is the point at which a new human life begins — that means IUDs are abortifacients. They “can end a human life,” writes OB-GYN Donna Harrison, citing medical research.
Marriage and Children Are a Recipe for Happiness
Now, it would be cynical to conclude that propaganda outlets like CNN and The New York Times push misinformation that hurts women — and thereby society — because making Americans miserable helps the Democrat Party. But it’s true that married women with children reliably vote Republican. They are also the happiest women in America. Single and childless women are the least happy.
There’s also a strong correlation between conservatism and happiness.
Contra feminist dogma, no woman is above criticism, and any in the public eye should be ready to engage good-faith critiques and teasing such as I’ve made above. But the relentless propaganda campaign against conservative women’s influencers not being feminist enough is baseless and in bad faith.
Truth is, these young women know a lot more than the corporate media they’re competing with. That’s because it’s as obvious as even fully clothed breasts. They know feminism makes women unhappy. They know well-adjusted women want marriage and children. They know it’s healthy for women to love what makes us different from men.
They’re hearing this from their audiences, and they’re taking it seriously. They may not be young moms trying to raise kids on one income, but the women making that sacrifice for the good of their children and all of us are grateful to get these influencers’ support. God knows the full-time mothers quietly making the whole world better are getting nothing but sneers and smears from corporate media.
That is why these women who publicly support femininity own media empires that have multiple times more viewers than CNN.
