FeaturedThe Point

Clinton Judge Demands Gov Free Illegal Alien Because He’s Very Angry

That’s Adrian Conejo Ramos up above. There’s a reason every media outlet in the country is deluging you with photos of a 5-year-old boy named Liam, who is supposedly his son, but whom Ramos abandoned and fled ICE personnel (and whose mother doesn’t want him either.)

In Texas, Clinton Judge Fred Biery ordered the illegal alien released while throwing a tantrum in paper form. There’s nothing resembling a legal ruling here.

Apparent also is the government’s ignorance of an American historical document called the Declaration of Independence. Thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson enumerated grievances against a would-be authoritarian king over our nascent nation. Among others were:

1. “He has sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People.”

2. “He has excited domestic Insurrection among us.”
3. “For quartering large Bodies of Armed Troops among us.”
4. “He has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies without the consent
of our Legislatures.”

“We the people” are hearing echos (sic) of that history

And then there is that pesky inconvenience called the Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and persons or things to be seized.

None of this has anything to do with the public arrest of an illegal alien in order to remove him from the country.

Accordingly, the Court finds that the Constitution of these United States trumps this administration’s detention of petitioner Adrian Conejo Arias and his minor son, L.C.R.

That’s not how rulings work.

Observing human behavior confirms that for some among us, the perfidious lust for unbridled power and the imposition of cruelty in its quest know no bounds and are bereft of human decency. And the rule of law be damned.

No, there’s not much more to the ruling than this.

This is a misspelled and poorly formatted rant that has nothing to do with the case at hand and amounts to a federal judge spitting and fuming, and demanding that the government carry out an action because he’s very angry.

This is not how the Constitution operates. Since Judge Biery wants a lesson in the Constitution, federal district judges don’t even exist in the Constitution, and a ruler who insists on issuing orders not grounded in the law is a tyrant. You know like old King George III.

It’s really time to roll back this judicial tyranny and these unhinged tyrants.

Source link

Related Posts

1 of 1,289