Was recognizing an Islamic terrorist state whose only identity is built on killing Jews right before one of the holiest days in the Jewish calendar, deliberate or accidental? That’s the sort of quibble best reserved for ‘offenses’ where sensitivity matters, not for actually empowering terrorists to kill people.
So whether or not the leftist governments of the UK, under PM Keir Starmer, Canada under Carney and Australia under Albanese, intended it that way or it was a happy accident that the UN’s latest session to empower terrorists had the perfect timing, what does matter is that they gave the terrorists what they wanted.
The idea of recognizing a ‘Palestinian’ state is an inherent absurdity. There are no such thing as ‘Palestinians’, just local Arab Muslims who decided to pick another name out of history, and there’s no state, just two enclaves run by two separate but loosely allied Islamic terror groups, the PLO and Hamas, which have never been able to manage their own affairs, which is why the UN, funded by us, actually provides everything for them.
And when there isn’t enough global welfare or they’re feeling extra whiny, they start shouting about “famine”.
So what is the basis for recognizing a ‘Palestinian’ state? History? Notable accomplishments? Culture? Nah.
There’s only one recent extraordinary accomplishment on which to base the Starmer/Carney/Albanese recognition. Oct 7.
That’s it.
That’s what Starmer, Carney and Albanese are recognizing as the basis for statehood. Islamic terrorism. But that’s also the only basis on which any Muslim state can exist. Including the ones forming in the UK, Canada and Australia.
